Tere
Huvitav paljudel siin on korralikke suurte koopiamudelite jooniseid?
Andke teada, mis teil on ja mida tahaks saada, äkki saavad siin inimesed omavahel jooniseid vahetada.
Marek
SCALE joonised
6A.1.9. Documentation for Proof of Scale
The minimum documentation as stated in 6.1.9.4. must be provided. Failure to comply shall result in penalty marks as follows:
a) Less than 3 full photos of prototype: ZERO points for Scale Accuracy(6.1.10.1)
Likely downmarking of Realism (6.1.10.4)
Likely downmarking of Craftsmanship (6.1.10.5)
Likely downmarking of Scale Detail (6.1.10.6)
b) Missing or unauthorised drawings: ZERO points for Scale Accuracy (6.1.10.1)
c) No photo of subject aircraft: ZERO points for markings (6.1.10.2)
Likely downmarking for Realism (6.1.10.4)
d) Incomplete colour documentation: ZERO points for Colour (6.1.10.3)
The documentation stated above is the absolute minimum required for participation. In reality more comprehensive evidence is needed to assess the model aircraft relative to the prototype. As the full size aircraft cannot be presented it follows that the photographic documentation provided should be as comprehensive as possible if a high score is to be achieved.
All documentation should relate to the subject aircraft whenever possible; variations from this must be clearly marked if not otherwise obvious. All relevant notes and corrections to the documentation should be in English.
The static judges have a difficult task to do in a short period of time. Documentation should therefore be presented in a format that can be quickly and accurately assessed. Superfluous or contradictory evidence should be avoided. The documentation should be presented on separate sheets to avoid the requirement for judges to continually turn pages for cross-references. A stiff A2 size sheet is considered to be the largest that may be comfortably handled by the judges. It will assist the judges if the documentation is presented in a format that reflects the sequence of the judging aspects, eg: Side view, End view, Plan view, Markings, Colour, etc.
The minimum documentation as stated in 6.1.9.4. must be provided. Failure to comply shall result in penalty marks as follows:
a) Less than 3 full photos of prototype: ZERO points for Scale Accuracy(6.1.10.1)
Likely downmarking of Realism (6.1.10.4)
Likely downmarking of Craftsmanship (6.1.10.5)
Likely downmarking of Scale Detail (6.1.10.6)
b) Missing or unauthorised drawings: ZERO points for Scale Accuracy (6.1.10.1)
c) No photo of subject aircraft: ZERO points for markings (6.1.10.2)
Likely downmarking for Realism (6.1.10.4)
d) Incomplete colour documentation: ZERO points for Colour (6.1.10.3)
The documentation stated above is the absolute minimum required for participation. In reality more comprehensive evidence is needed to assess the model aircraft relative to the prototype. As the full size aircraft cannot be presented it follows that the photographic documentation provided should be as comprehensive as possible if a high score is to be achieved.
All documentation should relate to the subject aircraft whenever possible; variations from this must be clearly marked if not otherwise obvious. All relevant notes and corrections to the documentation should be in English.
The static judges have a difficult task to do in a short period of time. Documentation should therefore be presented in a format that can be quickly and accurately assessed. Superfluous or contradictory evidence should be avoided. The documentation should be presented on separate sheets to avoid the requirement for judges to continually turn pages for cross-references. A stiff A2 size sheet is considered to be the largest that may be comfortably handled by the judges. It will assist the judges if the documentation is presented in a format that reflects the sequence of the judging aspects, eg: Side view, End view, Plan view, Markings, Colour, etc.
6.1.9.4. To be eligible for Fidelity to Scale (Static) points the following is the minimum documentation that must be submitted to the judges (See Annex A -6A.1.9. for recommended presentation of documentation):
a) Photographic evidence: At least three photographs or printed reproductions of the prototype, including at least one of the actual subject aircraft being modelled are required. Each of these photographs or printed reproductions must show the complete aircraft, preferably from different aspects. These main photos must be submitted in triplicate, the second and third copies may be photocopies. The photographic evidence is the prime means of judging scale accuracy against the prototype.
b) Scale Drawings: Accurate scale drawing of the full-size aircraft that show at least the 3 main aspects of Side View, Upper Plan View and Front End View. These drawings must be to a common scale giving a minimum span of 250 mm, and a maximum span of 500 mm or if the fuselage is longer than the wingspan, these measurements will be made on the fuselage. The drawings must be submitted in triplicate. Unpublished drawings by the competitor or other draftsman are not acceptable unless certified accurate in advance of the contest by an authoritative source such as the respective National Scale Committee or equivalent, the builder of the original aircraft, or other competent authority.
c) Proof of Colour: Correct colour may be established from colour photographs, from published descriptions if accompanied by colour chips certified by a competent authority, from samples of original paint, or from published colour drawings, eg "Profile" type publications.
d) Aircraft speed: The cruising speed of the subject aircraft must also be included in the documentation, and repeated on all flight score sheets before each official flight starts. In the case of early aircraft, where only maximum speeds are likely to be listed, the maximum speed alone may be quoted in the documentation. The competitor must be prepared to substantiate this information if required.
e) Competitor’s declaration: The competitor must include in his documentation a declaration that he is the builder of the model aircraft entered, listing all components of the model aircraft he did not make himself. If using modified ready-made parts, it is the competitor’s responsibility to prove the modification and that this is done by him. The competitor must also complete and sign the required declaration form (See Annex 6E) confirming these and other aspects. If found in violation the competitor may be disqualified from the contest.
Veel, et koopiamudel pole mitte lennuki tüübiga sarnane asjandus, vaid on ühe konkreetse lennuki koopia. Nii käsitleb FAI (lennundusinimesed maailmas) koopiaid juba kümneid aastaid.
a) Photographic evidence: At least three photographs or printed reproductions of the prototype, including at least one of the actual subject aircraft being modelled are required. Each of these photographs or printed reproductions must show the complete aircraft, preferably from different aspects. These main photos must be submitted in triplicate, the second and third copies may be photocopies. The photographic evidence is the prime means of judging scale accuracy against the prototype.
b) Scale Drawings: Accurate scale drawing of the full-size aircraft that show at least the 3 main aspects of Side View, Upper Plan View and Front End View. These drawings must be to a common scale giving a minimum span of 250 mm, and a maximum span of 500 mm or if the fuselage is longer than the wingspan, these measurements will be made on the fuselage. The drawings must be submitted in triplicate. Unpublished drawings by the competitor or other draftsman are not acceptable unless certified accurate in advance of the contest by an authoritative source such as the respective National Scale Committee or equivalent, the builder of the original aircraft, or other competent authority.
c) Proof of Colour: Correct colour may be established from colour photographs, from published descriptions if accompanied by colour chips certified by a competent authority, from samples of original paint, or from published colour drawings, eg "Profile" type publications.
d) Aircraft speed: The cruising speed of the subject aircraft must also be included in the documentation, and repeated on all flight score sheets before each official flight starts. In the case of early aircraft, where only maximum speeds are likely to be listed, the maximum speed alone may be quoted in the documentation. The competitor must be prepared to substantiate this information if required.
e) Competitor’s declaration: The competitor must include in his documentation a declaration that he is the builder of the model aircraft entered, listing all components of the model aircraft he did not make himself. If using modified ready-made parts, it is the competitor’s responsibility to prove the modification and that this is done by him. The competitor must also complete and sign the required declaration form (See Annex 6E) confirming these and other aspects. If found in violation the competitor may be disqualified from the contest.
Veel, et koopiamudel pole mitte lennuki tüübiga sarnane asjandus, vaid on ühe konkreetse lennuki koopia. Nii käsitleb FAI (lennundusinimesed maailmas) koopiaid juba kümneid aastaid.